Wikipedia: Ban it or Boost it?
It wasn’t until a couple of years ago that a buddy told me that Wikipedia isn’t the best place to get hard factual data. Because any person at any time can add to a topic explanation, there is a chance that information can be stretched or flat out untrue. When I look on a site, I want to be able to trust the content I am looking at or at least get some information that’s accurate.
I used to use Wikipedia quite a bit, especially to pass the time. I could look up such a range of topics. I used it and it listed all the Civil Wars (OSU vs. UO) complete with the winning team, score, and home site for over 100 years. I would say that I use it now around once a week when I am surfing the web or want to know something obscure. I usually will start my search by going to the English page and typing in the first couple letters of what I am interested in and go from there. There may be times it leads me to other websites or other topics. I think it’s a fun site to obtain fun facts or just getting a little “candy” for the brain.
As a teacher I would accept some projects or assignments that had some information from Wikipedia. I would definitely require other references and websites to back up the data used or found. I would encourage my students to look for reliability and credibility when it comes to using Wikipedia and other sites as well. I think the Website Credibility assignment we did in our current class was a great tool to use when analyzing a website and its validity. Students would have to know what Wikipedia is all about and that just because it’s found on the site, it’s not always true or accurate. They have to use their brains. I would not accept a project with Wikipedia data by itself.
From the article, the statement regarding “flags” on pages of topics lets the user know that not all the data is 100%, there could be an opinion present, as well as omissions. The student is able to see this and should be encouraged to research the topic further or use other references. Another piece from the article stated the wide range of items available to research. If anything, a students can explore a website, start looking into a topic, and draw comparisons to other sites with other postings involving the same topic. It really can be a learning experience.
My policy for my students regarding Internet research would be to really examine the reliability of the sites you are using, especially for a project, paper, or group assignment. Using a form of a Website Credibility worksheet would be a nice tool to get used to knowing what to look for in a credible site. I would want them to have back up information other than just Internet based, depending on the importance of the assignment. I have noticed when I look up items on Wikipedia that I know a lot about or have experience in; they are usually pretty good and accurate. I would also want them to document their sources so I could always go and check the accuracy of their work and references. I would keep Wikipedia around and will continue to use it; I just take what I find with a grain of salt these days and always like confirming the information found.